Will President Hillary Pardon Herself?

shutterstock_504001402

Although the FBI declared yesterday that Hillary Clinton will not be prosecuted for her crimes involving her reckless handling of classified information, she is still being investigated for public corruption and “pay for play” schemes involving the Clinton Foundation. But what will happen if Hillary becomes the next president of the United States? President Obama will pardon her in order to protect himself from being exposed in her web of lies and deceit or President Hillary will be within her legal rights to pardon herself for all crimes committed since she entered into public life over 30 years ago. She will NEVER be punished for what she has done to this country.

Over the last year the public has been made aware of the “pay for play” scheme that the Clinton Foundation has been and continues to be involved in. This began when Hillary was Secretary of State. In exchange for a hefty donation to the Foundation, Hillary made it possible for Russia to get their hands on 20% of US uranium that is now being sold to Iran. Since the horrible Iranian deal, made by Obama and John Kerry, their number one goal is to destroy western civilization and now, thanks to Hillary, they are on their way. Recently we discovered the Clinton’s paid for Chelsea Clinton’s wedding from donations to the Clinton Foundation. We have all had a front row seat to her willful recklessness in the handling of National Security secrets and classified information. It was recently discovered that Hilary was allowing her maid to print copies of President Obama’s daily CIA briefing and Huma Aberdeen was forwarding classified information to her home computer where her husband, Anthony Weiner, aka Carlos Danger, had open access to National Security Secrets and God knows what else, all while he was forwarding perverted texts to an underage child in North Carolina. This sick and twisted web of lies, deceit and willful corruption will continue under the presidency of Hillary Clinton, if she is elected.

The American people have a very important decision to make tomorrow when they go to the polls. Whether or not you are thrilled with either of your choices, you have to look very clearly at each candidate and decide, NOT who offends you the most, but who will FIGHT for the American people. We have seen the Clinton Camp lie and plead the fifth, ad nauseum, throughout the Obama presidency and during her attempt to take the most important office in the United States. The IRS was caught targeting conservatives because of their political beliefs, the Attorney General of the Justice Department was caught by a reporter corroborating with Bill Clinton, while he and Hillary, were both under federal investigation. The mainstream media have been caught red-handed lying to the people, handing over questions to Hillary before debates, asking the Clinton camp what questions they should ask her opponent in the presidential debates. The head of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Shultz was fired for rigging the election in Hillary’s favor while throwing Bernie Sanders under the bus and was then immediately hired by the Clinton camp. Add insult to injury, Hillary has pointed the finger at Wall Street while behind closed doors, she has taken millions of dollars in donations from them and has said she would like them to take over the control of our economy. She also wants to grant amnesty to 30-40 million illegals in this country and dreams of completely open borders within the United States. Although we have all seen the devastation occurring in France and Germany at the hands of unvetted refugees, Hillary is determined to open our borders to hundreds of thousands of these same refugees. She will also have the opportunity to appoint up to four new Supreme Court Justices, who she will use to further destroy our rights to the freedom of speech, religion and bearing arms. The lies and corruption have been on clear display for everyone to see and like her predecessor, she has told us exactly what she plans on doing to further fundamentally transform the United States.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump was exposed on a tape using locker room talk and calling out Rosie O’Donnell. His comments were and still remain offensive to most Americans, however, he has not called for an audit on any taxpayers for their support of Hillary Clinton. He has not shared or disclosed confidential information that placed FBI assets in danger or caused them to be killed. He has not sold out the United States to fatten his own wallet. He has been accused of actually following the tax law that was written and put in place by our very own government and is the first candidate who actually made his fortune BEFORE he ran for government office. He has not taken a dime from special interests in this campaign, but has used his own money and donations from United States citizens.

You have to ask yourself one question. Who do you think will use the office of the Presidency to better the country and put the American people first?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Democrats Promise A Future Of Lawlessness; Coming To Your Town Soon!

th-1

In Milwaukee, Black Lives Matter activists, looters and rioters set out to hunt down and attack any and all white people.  Sherelle Smith, sister of Sylville Smith, the criminal shot down in Milwaukee, called for rioters to stop burning down their own neighborhoods and businesses  and head out to the suburbs and burn them down.

“You’re burning down  s**t we need in our community. Take that s**t to the suburbs! Burn that s**t down! We need our s**t, we need our weaves, I don’t wear them but we need them. We need our gas, We need our food. We need this. You all want to hurt somebody, take that shit further out.”

Was she arrested for inciting violence? Nope! As a matter of fact, CNN, immediately portrayed her as a hero in their newscast. Editing her screams, demanding the death of white people, down to a call for peace.

“Family and friends holding a vigil marked by prayers whith his sister calling for peace.” -Ana Cabera CNN.”

When the media refuses to report the truth, there should be consequences. The media and liberal politics have become interchangeable. The incestuous relationship of the liberal press with government has reached a new high. Media Research Center has a current list of those “revolving between working on behalf of Obama and positions in the news media” which has reached 30. There should be outrage over the destruction of real journalism. When will these so-called news agencies be held accountable for their lies and the fallout caused by their misrepresentation of the truth?

If we shift to Trump rallies and fund-raising events,  we see innocent people attacked, beaten up, spit on and harassed for their political beliefs.  Since the beginning of the campaign season, we have watched the violence escalate, yet nothing is done. Have you seen these videos shown and reported by the mainstream media? No, and you won’t, because if a conservative, a Trump supporter, a police officer or a veteran is attacked for any reason, it will not be reported, because their rights no longer matter under the current liberal definition of free speech, freedom of religion, the rule of law or just plain decency. The so-called tolerant political party only decries violence when it serves their purposes.

Add insult to injury, our government has promoted and continues to destroy the rule of law in the United States. President Obama refuses to enforce our immigration laws, while the IRS hands out tax refunds to illegals. Companies like Disney continue to abuse our visa system as an excuse to fire American workers and hire foreigners, the Department of Justice, headed by Loretta Lynch, recently filed, before a federal appeals court,  that it is unconstitutional to hold criminals, who are poor, in jail when they can’t afford bail. The DOJ has also threatened to deal with anyone who dare criticize Muslims, while terrorism is  targeted at Christians, gays and women. Meanwhile hard-working, law-abiding citizens are targeted for the color of their skin and the Obama administration along with Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine, continuously blame law enforcement and white people for the violence.

We have all seen the destruction and mayhem caused by the importation of un-vetted refugees into Europe. Terrorist attacks and crime have escalated as a direct result of the irresponsible actions of  their government leaders. Yet, as our media refuses to report these horrendous events, our president and Hillary Clinton are determined to march forward with allowing untold numbers of refugees that cannot be vetted, into the United States and into your local community.

What has happened to common sense and the rule of law? It has been ousted as racism, bigotry and white privilege. Therefore, a vote for Hillary will result in an escalation of lawlessness and will soon be on its way to a town near you!

 

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Not all Muslims Are Terrorists But Aren’t All Terrorists Muslim?

shutterstock_378357655

 

President Obama is once again refusing to react to the line that he drew in the sand in the fight to decimate and destroy ISIL. But this time the consequences are deadly. The American people are being placed in harm’s way. A directive from the White House tells the FBI to “Back off Muslims,” even though the facts tell us that all terrorists are Muslim.

In a statement just a few days ago regarding the attack in Orlando, Obama said,

“We currently do not have any information to indicate that a foreign terrorist group directed the attack in Orlando.”

But what do we know about the attack in retrospect? The terrorist, Mateen, called 911 during the attack to pledge his allegiance to ISIS. He also called CNN News 13 in Orlando to proclaim he was carrying out the massacre on behalf of the terror group.

“I’m the shooter. It’s me. I am the shooter,” Mateen said, according to Gentili. “I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State.”

But after all these bold proclamations from the terrorist himself, our President, yet again, goes on air to deny that this man was a terrorist or affiliated with any terrorist group. When will the President of the United States actually stand up and identify the enemy within our gates and do what is necessary to protect the people he took an oath to defend?

Despite the terrorist attack in Orlando, Obama just days after the killing, opened our borders to 400 new Syrian refugees who have not and cannot be vetted, against the strong advice of the CIA director, John O. Brennan,

“The group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.”

Yet despite Brennan’s advise, Obama has admitted 441 Syrian refugees, only 5 Christians, and has settled them in Florida, Illinois and Arizona. Six were placed in Orlando, the location of the recent terrorist attack on the gay community and only days after the horrific attack. Add insult to injury, the White House refuses to share any information on these refugees with local law enforcement claiming they have a right to privacy. What about our right to safety?

Although the debate is heating up over whether the U.S. should take these refugees, the Obama administration has dramatically increased processing of refugees in order to reach its goal of 10,000 before the end of the year. In 2016 alone, Obama has admitted 4,328 Syrian refugees, 4,289 whom are Muslims, the majority were not vetted.

On a news report last night, former assistant director, James Kallstrom, says a directive has come down directly from the White House to “Back Off Muslims.” The FBI is being told by the white house that they cannot go into mosques, or proceed with normal investigative paths against Muslims. The public is told to say something if you see something, yet at the same time, Loretta Lynch, the attorney general of the U.S. says the Department of Justice has threatened to take action against any and all anti-Muslim rhetoric or violent talk. Isn’t this just a promise to go after anyone who might point the finger at questionable behavior by a Muslim, like Mateen, and an attack on free speech by the very department that is assigned to protect our rights? You also have to ask yourself why our DOJ is not taking action against the “Black Lives Matter” activists hate speech, who are screaming for law enforcement to be killed? Can you say hypocrisy?

A florida gun store owner contacted local authorities when Mateen tried to buy body armor and arsenal of ammunition 2 months before the attack in Orlando, but nothing was done. So does it matter when the public raises the red flag or are our law enforcement officers hands tied behind their backs by the current rules of engagement?

Back in December, a whistleblower, Philip Haney from Homeland Security was responsible for investigating individuals with suspected ties to radical terrorism. He had received a commendation letter for successfully tracking down 300 terrorists. However, he was visited by the State Department and the Homeland Security Civil Rights Division and told his investigations were “profiling” Muslims and was subsequently shut down. All his records were destroyed including information into the terrorist that committed the attack in San Bernadino. Even now, the White House refuses to look into the social media accounts of potential Muslim immigrants even though the San Bernadino and Orlando terrorists posted on social media.

Former FBI assistant director, James Kallstrom says we have to get this wet blanket of political correctness off the back of agents. We need to change the rules of engagement.  Training manuals are being permanently altered in the name of political correctness and Congress has done nothing to make the job for the FBI easier. Although the Director of the FBI says they are critically understaffed, the administration has done nothing to alter that situation at a time when it is obvious to all Americans that it is desperately needed.

It appears all common sense and logic have been tossed out the White House window. If the majority of all terrorist are Muslim, then how do you call investigating potential Muslim refugees and immigrants “profiling?” It’s time to put the safety of the American people first and throw political correctness out the window along with the president.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Democratic Debate Sets The Stage For More Of The Same

imgres-1

Anderson Cooper of CNN began the Democratic debate on Tuesday with an important question to Hillary Clinton,

“Will you say anything to get elected? Some Democrats believe you changed your positions based on political expediency.  You’re against same-sex marriage now you are for it.  You defended President Obama’s immigration policy now you say they are too harsh. You supported his trade deal dozens of times you even called it the gold standard, suddenly last week you’re against it.”

Her answer?

“I have been consistent over the course of my entire life. ”Watch the following clip and judge for yourself. (https://youtu.be/clYVEgrTZtE) 

When the candidates were asked about the biggest threat to the United States, Hillary responded by saying “the spread of nuclear weapons” and “nuclear material that can fall into the wrong hands.”

Although Hillary may be right on track with her concerns about nuclear weapons, she also, was one of the biggest supporters of President Obama’s deal with Iran. We all know now, that Iran will be able to develop nuclear weapons within a 10 to 15 year time period. Now that is a big threat to the United States.

Bernie Sanders responded by saying,

“The scientific community is telling us, if we do not address the climate change, transform our energy system away from fossil fuel, the planet we’ll be leaving our kids and our grandchildren may well not be habitable.”

Bernie Sanders, who believes that climate change is the biggest threat to the United States, obviously feels that ISIS, Russia, China, Iran and the non stop spending that adds more and more to our National debt, are not an immediate threat to our very survival.

One thing that all the Democratic candidates agreed on was the continued handout of freebies to all.

  1. Free in-state tuition for Illegals
  2. Free healthcare for Illegals
  3. Free healthcare
  4. Free healthcare for children
  5. Paid healthcare
  6. Paid family leave
  7. Expanded medicare
  8. Free Childhood education
  9. Higher minimum wage
  10. Free prescription drugs
  11. Expanded social security

The obvious question that was not asked  was how and who would be paying for all these freebies? The United States is currently almost $19 trillion dollars in debt. President Obama has been unable to pass a single budget since he has been in office because he refuses to cut spending or reign in fraud or the duplicity in government agencies. Some might blame that on Republicans, however, he has been unable to obtain a single vote from either party in most cases. We have all been told that Social Security is going broke and those of us who have paid into the system may not get paid.  If all Americans were forced to pay into social security, being assured that it will be given back in their retirement, then exactly where is that money now? The government spent it and now expects the American people to let it go. However, we are to swallow the fact that this same government plans on paying for healthcare, housing, education and college tuition for illegals, who have broken our laws by even entering into the country? We are to believe that all public universities and colleges are going to give away a free education to all that want one without blinking an eye? We are to expect that all pharmaceutical companies are going to just lay down and agree to give away free prescription drugs to all who need them? No, all these freebies must and will be paid for by the American taxpayer. Taxes must be raised to cover these expenses or the US will be forced to pull out more credit cards in which to max out in order to cover these so-called freebies. Did we not learn anything from the recent economy crash in Greece? Most Americans are fully aware what happens when you continue to charge and are unable to pay off your balance. Eventually you are unable to pay off even the minimum balance due on a monthly basis. If you can’t pay it results in bankruptcy or financial ruin.

But, the facts are a stubborn thing and the only way to pay for all these freebies is to send the bill to the American people disguising it as higher taxes. We could also go the route of socialism, as Bernie Sanders believes, by stealing money from hardworking Americans and forcing them to go broke by paying for all these freebies, eventually running out of money themselves, putting us right back to where we started…broke, yet still spending.

No matter what party you support, the facts are the facts, and the United States needs to reign in the reckless spending, freebies to non citizens, and get back to hard work, the free market system and stop this “more of the same mentality” that has put us where we are today.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Full Disclosure For All!

shutterstock_144659312

Our government has pushed food labeling to the extreme. Demanding that calories, fat, sugar and other ingredients be fully visible to the public in order for them to be able to make informed decisions about the food they eat. But what about informing the public about the news they receive on a daily basis? Does the public deserve the same transparency about their news sources that the government is now demanding from food manufacturers and restaurants?  After all, if how the public is informed  will affect the way this country is governed, shouldn’t the they be informed what political party a news anchor, reporter or station supports before they get their daily dose of political propaganda?

Have you ever wondered about the news anchor or the station that you watch on a daily basis? Do you know the political party of the owner of the news station you listen to on a daily basis? Do you ever wonder whether the political leanings of reporters actually affects the news they report? When a nightly news anchor choses the stories they report on a daily basis, do they choose them or alter them according to their political leanings? Does the public now receive the news in a completely unbiased format? We have all seen the political polarization that has intensified in this country over the last several years. Lines have been drawn between friends and family, relationships strained, friends lost and unfriended on Facebook over political opinions and leanings. But what about the very people who are supposed to inform us, without personal feelings, about the most important events happening around us on a daily basis?

Did you know that all journalists are required to follow a Code of Ethics? As part of these ethics, news anchors are supposed to  “distinguish between advocacy and news reporting,” while simultaneously “seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.”  But, is this what they do today? Are you actually receiving a fair and comprehensive account of the news or are you receiving political propaganda and half-truths according to the political leanings of the station and reporter feeding you the news on a daily basis? Are they using the news as a platform to further the political agenda of the party they support?

The American people used to count on the press to act as a check and balance with our political leaders. To question motives, decisions, actions and ethics. Would President Nixon have resigned  because of Watergate had Bob Woodard and Carl Bernstein not investigated and exposed his illegal actions? Has it become obvious that this era of reporters and so-called journalists no longer honor their ethical responsibilities over their personal beliefs and views?

As we are now headed into a big election year, 2016 stands to be the most important election this country has seen in years. It is not only about which party will lead us the next four years, but which direction this country will be headed.  The Democratic and Republican parties have chosen polar opposite directions in which they believe the country should be headed. It is imperative that the public be fully and correctly informed about the platforms that each party supports. It is imperative that the public be fully and correctly informed about the actions the Democrats and Republicans have taken and will take in order to follow the platforms they support and further the agenda they have chosen to follow.  So should we, the people, be given full disclosure about the very people and stations that deliver the news?

George Stephanopoulos:  Host of Good Morning America and This Week with George Stephanopoulos. George is a Democrat, and served as communications director for Bill Clinton and later became his White House communications director.  It was recently discovered that he donated $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation all while he grilled Peter Schweitzer on his recent book, Clinton Cash, which casts a shadow of doubt on the source and use of  Clinton charity funds.

Christiane Amanpour: Anchor CNN. Christiane is a Democrat and is married to former US Assistant Secretary of State, James Rubin, a democrat and an informal adviser to Hilary Clinton, presidential candidate.

Chris Cuomo: Democrat and former host of Good Morning America, 20/20 and currently CNN’s morning show, “New Day.” Chris’s father, Mario Cuomo was the former Democratic Mayor of New York. His brother, Andrew Cuomo is the current Democratic New York Governor.

Brian Williams:  Anchor ABC and Democrat. He began his career as a White House intern under Jimmy Carter. Recently, he was suspended for 6 months due to fabricated news stories.

Savannah Gutherie: Co-anchor of the Today Show,  and co-anchor of the MSNBC’s The Daily Rundown,  Savannah is currently married to Democratic political and communications consultant, Michael Feldman.

Rachael Maddow: Anchor of the Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC. A 2011 Hollywood Reporter profile of Maddow said that she was able to deliver news “with agenda, but not hysteria.” A Newsweek profile noted, “At her best, Maddow debates ideological opponents with civility and persistence… But for all her eloquence, she can get so wound up ripping Republicans that she sounds like another smug cable partisan.”

Bill O’Reilly:  Anchor of the O’Reilly Factor on Fox News, a conservative station, is a registered “independent” yet a traditionalist. He is married to Maureen McPhilmy, a public relations representative.

Megyn Kelly:  Anchor of the Kelly File on Fox News considers herself to be a moderate and reasonable. She often speaks in ways that run counter to Fox’s image. She is married to Douglas Brunt, who is a full time writer and novelist.

Did you know?

  1. ABC News President, Ben Sherwood, is the brother of Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, a top national security adviser to President Obama.
  2. CNN’s deputy Washington Bureau chief, , is married to Tom Nides, who was deputy secretary of state under Hillary Clinton.
  3. Former White House press secretary, Jay Carney’s wife, Claire Shipman, is a veteran reporter for ABC, and currently is the senior national correspondent for Good Morning America.
  4. NPR’s White House correspondent, Ari Shapiro, is married to Michael Gottlieb, who is currently employed at the Obama White House counsel’s office.
  5. Michele Norris of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” is married to Broderick Johnson, who worked for Senator John Kerry’s presidential campaign and then moved on as an unpaid adviser to Obama’s campaign in 2008, and full-time advisor in 2011.
  6. The Post’s Justice Department reporter, Sari Horwitz, is married to William Schultz, the general counsel of the Department of Human Services under the Obama Administration.
  7. David Rhodes, CBS news division president is the brother of Benjamin Rhodes, a key foreign policy specialist under Obama. Both David and Benjamin also work at the NSC on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi.

Let’s go even further and disclose that only six corporations own and control the majority of mass media outlets in the United States.

  1. Disney
  2. CBS Corporation
  3. News Corporation
  4. Viacom
  5. Time Warner
  6. Comcast

So what happens when a news story involves bad publicity for one of these companies, or goes against the political agenda they are pushing? Could the story be shut down or underplayed in the media? The Telecommunication Act of 1996, signed into effect by then President Bill Clinton, enabled this handful of corporations to expand their power and enabled tighter control of information. Chris Hedges argues that corporate media control “of nearly everything we read, watch or hear,” is an aspect of what political philosopher Sheldon Wolin calls inverted totalitarianism. This is defined as a situation “where every natural resource and every living being is commoditized ad exploited to collapse as the citizenry is lulled and manipulated into surrendering their liberties and their participation in government through excess consumerism and sensationalism.”

As the sources for all our news gets smaller and smaller, and the majority seemingly controlled by one political faction, it is time to demand full disclosure before every news cast so the public is truly informed who is spoon-feeding them their news for the day.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

“Lies; the New Truth?”

Unknown

Sandra Fluke. Who is she? Do you know what she stands for?  What do you know about her qualifications? What does she have to do with Hobby Lobby? Does she speak the truth or does she tell Lies; the new truth?

In March of 2012, Sandra Fluke was a student at Georgetown, a Jesuit university, and spoke before an unofficial hearing convened by Democrats. At the hearing, she criticized  Georgetown University because they would not pay for or cover her birth control, and she made the following statement,

 “When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage. And especially in the last week, I have heard more and more of their stories. On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or from another school or who works for a religiously affiliated employer, and they tell me that they have suffered financially, emotionally and medically, because of this lack of coverage. And so I’m here today to share their voices, and I want to thank you for allowing them — them, not me — to be heard.” I am an American woman who uses contraceptives!”

Enter Rush Limbaugh, who responds on his radio show by saying,

 “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”

Because of Limbaugh’s comments, Sandra Fluke became an overnight sensation. She was suddenly the expert on contraceptives and women’s healthcare rights. Immediately she began touring colleges and universities around the United States talking to young girls and women about empowerment and how Republicans were purposefully taking away women’s access to healthcare and contraceptives.

She was then invited to speak at the Democratic  National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. After her speech, which wrongly accused Republicans of mentally, emotionally and physically abusing women, James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal wrote,

“Seriously, the party of Andrew Jackson and Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman chose to showcase someone whose claim to fame is that she demands that somebody else pay for her birth control.”

Erick Erickson of CNN said,

“Of course Rush Limbaugh was being insulting. He was using it as a tool to highlight just how absurd the Democrats’ position is on this. It’s what he does and does quite well. And in the process he’s exposing a lot of media bias on the issue as people rush out (no pun intended) to make Sandra Fluke a victim of his insults and dance around precisely what is really insulting? Her testimony before congress that American taxpayers should subsidize the sexual habits of Georgetown Law School students because, God forbid, they should stop having sex if they cannot afford the pills themselves.”

Is contraception really unaffordable? Lets look at the cost.  As reported in US News, Money and Personal Finance, the cost runs between $15 and $50 per month depending on your insurance coverage. This amounts to $150 to $600 per year. The cost of condoms, which also prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, runs from 20 cents to $2.50 a piece. Depending on your personal taste in condoms, a max of about $150 per year.

Now, let’s look at the TRUTH behind the Hobby Lobby case that went before the Supreme Court and the FACTS surrounding their decision.

First, the actual complaint (reader’s digest version directly from the court documents):

 “The Green Family’s religious beliefs forbid them from participating in, providing access to, paying for, training others to engage in, or otherwise supporting abortion-causing drugs and devices.”

What does that really represent?  Below is a list of exactly what Hobby Lobby now and will continue to cover and offer all its employees:

  1.  Male condoms
  2. Female condoms
  3. Diaphragms with spermicide
  4. Sponges with spermicide
  5. Cervical caps with spermicide
  6. Spermicide alone
  7. Birth-control pills with estrogen and progestin (“Combined Pill)
  8. Birth-control pills with progestin alone (“The Mini Pill)
  9. Birth control pills (extended/continuous use)
  10. Contraceptive patches
  11. Contraceptive rings
  12. Progestin injections
  13. Implantable rods
  14. Vasectomies
  15. Female sterilization surgeries
  16. Female sterilization implants

Below is a list of  exactly does Hobby Lobby does not want to  cover or offer all its employees based on their religious beliefs:

  1. Plan B (“The Morning After Pill
  2. ”Ella (a similar type of “emergency contraception”)
  3. Copper Intra-Uterine Device
  4. IUD with progestin

What is the difference between these two lists?

The first list is currently what Hobby Lobby offers to all its employers and is considered “contraception.” The items in this list PREVENT pregnancy.

The second list is what Hobby Lobby will not offer its employees based on their religious beliefs. The four items listed are all ABORTION INDUCING devices or medications. These are used AFTER pregnancy is achieved.

In conclusion, Hobby Lobby has no issues supplying its employees with coverage for the PREVENTION of pregnancy, i.e. contraception, nor does it interfere with a woman’s healthcare.

The Supreme Court agreed with Hobby Lobby.

So now lets go back to Sandra Fluke, a woman who graduated from Georgetown University, with a degree in law, and a double major at Cornell University.  After the Supreme Court released its findings, Sandra Fluke interpreted their ruling and made the following statement,

“What this is really about at its base is trying to figure out as many ways as possible to limit women’s access to reproductive healthcare.”

Did I miss something? Did Hobby Lobby refuse to pay for any contraception or healthcare for women? Did the Supreme Court decide that religious organizations did not have  to pay for ANY women’s healthcare or contraception? Why is she misrepresenting the findings? The only thing that is being limited in regards to women is abortion inducing drugs or procedures.

Did Sandra Fluke really learn the law at Georgetown or is she purposefully distorting the truth in order to tow the party line and support  the agenda of the Democratic party?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic Party’s national chairwoman said,

 “This is going to turn the dial back. Republicans want to do everything they can to have the long hand of government, and now the long hand of business, reach into a woman’s body and make healthcare decisions for her.”

Democratic senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire said,

“ Today’s Supreme Court decision unfortunately jeopardizes basic healthcare coverage and access to contraception for a countless number of women.”

Senate Democratic leader, Harry Reid said,

“Our party must now fight to preserve women’s access to contraceptive coverage.”

Hillary Clinton chastised the Supreme Court for ruling that an employer can refuse to provide women with contraception on religious grounds.

CBS reported,

“The Supreme Court as pitted women’s rights against religious freedom. It upheld a challenge to a key provision of Obamacare—the one that requires coverage for birth control.”

Is that really what the ruling said?  Or has this just become another witch-hunt to distract voters from the real issues and to garner votes for the Democrats? Another “War on Women” campaign?

Is it just a coincidence that mainstream media along with Democrats are screaming from the rooftops that the Republicans have taken away the rights of women to receive healthcare and contraception?

As a taxpayer, whether you are pro-life or pro-choice, why should our employers or we be responsible for picking up the tab for an abortion when a woman fails to protect herself during a sexual encounter? Is that really our responsibility? Is it okay to demand rights for yourself while stomping on the rights of others?

Have we seen a pattern established in this country under the current administration that has taken hold? A pattern where no one is held responsible or accountable for his or her own actions? Where the taxpayer is responsible for putting up their hard earned dollars to cover everyones bad decisions?  Have we seen our government and our media distort and misrepresent the truth in the name of politics? Is it okay to lie, cheat and steal in order to get the votes needed to win?

What happened to honor and truth and facts? Or have Lies become the new truth?

 

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather