Finally the infamous Memo is released and despite cries from Democrats otherwise, it is a scathing memo that uncovers the weaponization of government by the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch and top FBI leaders, to discredit candidate Trump as well as influence the 2016 Presidential election.
Can anyone forget the love affair between Barack Obama and the media in the 2008 presidential election? They fell for him hook, line and sinker, based on his race, without doing their due diligence. All Americans are now suffering the consequences of their failure to accurately inform the American people. The closer we come to the end of his presidency, the more details emerge about his questionable background, family ties, mentors, education and his promise to fundamentally change the United States. Had the media done their jobs, would Barack Obama have been the Democratic nominee?
Are we to suffer the same consequences regarding Hillary Clinton’s run for the presidency and the media’s purposeful cover up of her past? As a result, we must ask the appropriate questions and shine a light on the history of a woman who has been under criminal investigation from the moment she descended into the public light.
If you google Hillary and Bill Clinton, you will find site after site detailing their numerous scandals, beginning from the moment they stepped into the public realm and before. If you are not aware of their questionable activities, then you have not done your due diligence before heading into the voting booth in November. I know, everyone is too busy with jobs, kids, and life in general to take the time required to research Hillary and Bill Clinton. Considering the number of scandals they have been connected with, it is, in fact, a time-consuming feat. The one question I will ask of you, is how in the world can a woman with such a dark and questionable past even be considered as a potential leader of the free world? How, in the information age, can anyone even think about voting for Hillary if they have never typed her name into a search engine? If you don’t have the time, I will dedicate a series of articles to educate you regarding the scandals that have become a normal part of Hillary and Bill Clinton’s resume.
Let’s start off with one of Hillary’s most despicable acts when she reached the White House. It has been labeled as Travelgate.
Billy Dale was the Director of the White House Travel Office. He began his employment in 1961 under Kennedy and held this job for 32 years, serving seven U.S. Presidents, including Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. The most ironic part of this story is the fact that Billy Dale even voted for the Clintons.
A family man, Dale was raised in the Appalachian Mountains and was the third of seven children.Losing his mother when he was just 16, he was raised by his father. Upon graduating high school, Dale went to work in the coal mines but quickly decided it was not for him. As a result he joined the U.S. Air Force and subsequently married his high school sweet heart. After leaving the military he went to work at the Veterans Administration. After only 14 months there, he was offered a position at the White House. He began his job in 1961 during the Kennedy administration. In 1966, Billy was asked to take over the travel department. He was occasionally asked to fill in and travel on a presidential trip. He accompanied President Nixon to China on his historical trop to re-establish diplomatic relations. Dale was promoted to assistant director in 1977 and then as Director in 1982. His trouble began when the Clintons came to the White House.
“We all knew that we were in for a rougher transition because we had heard stories from secret service agents that had gone to Little Rock for a two-week stay down there. And from the stories that the agents came back and told us we knew it was going to be different. We didn’t realize how different it was going to be.”
Harry Thomason, one of the Clinton’s closest friends and biggest contributors from Arkansas had an interest in Thomason, Richland and Martens Inc, (TRM) an aircraft charter company. They were interested in obtaining the White House travel business. When they attempted to convince Billy Dale to use TRM’s brokerage services, Dale declined saying he did not need a middleman as that was the job of the White House travel office. Thompson then accused Dale’s choice of airline as “decidedly anti-Clinton” and “Republican-operated.” Thompson than gained administration passes giving him unrestricted access to the White House. It was at this point that he passed on rumors to the Clintons that the travel office employees were taking kickbacks. On May 19, all seven employees of the travel department were fired claiming reorganization and cut backs. They all found out later, through a press conference, that they were under suspicion for misconduct. Not surprisingly, friends of the Clintons were placed in the travel office having connections to TRM.
Every president has the right to hire new travel office staff. However no president had ever done so for over 30 years. But Hillary Clinton, instead of firing the travel office employees,
engineered criminal charges and then fired them, in order to reward employees with ties to her past.
Tony Blankley, former editor of the Washington Times. said,
“When they turned on the travel office, where you had career civil service employees doing a great job …they could have fired him, but they accused him of a crime. They tried to ruin his life in order to get their lackeys in,”
Not only was Billy Dale fired, but he was locked out of his office, accused of embezzling $14,000, and was unable to account for the money because the logs had suddenly disappeared.
Gary Aldrich. a former FBI agent involved with the case said,
“This taught me that powerful politicians can misuse law enforcement authority whimsically. And because it was the first lady who was ordering the investigation than charges have to be found. If we have reached the level that when a politician gets irritated with somebody and cause them to end up in federal prison then we have a serious problem.”
Billy Dale not only had to fight for his life, and deal with being totally humiliated but was also audited by the IRS two times.
When Dale realized that his legal bills were estimated at $750,000, he decided to take a plea bargain. But when he was informed he would not be able to proclaim his innocence he refused to take the deal. What followed was a 30 month investigation into Billy Dale and the subsequent annihilation of his life long dedication to his country and his career.
From a film documenting this case,
“One indication that this prosecution was a government initiated witch hunt was that the people who were allegedly victimized by the so-called embezzlement didn’t believe Dale had stolen their money. There were no victims here. This was not the government’s money at all, but the press corps. Many of them testified on his behalf at the trial saying they trusted him when he ran the travel office and still trusted him today. Wendy Whitworth – VP for CNN/Exec Producer of Larry King Live, Robert Hartman- CBS producer, Sam Donaldson and Brit Hume- ABC anchors, to name a few. When Dale’s attorney, Mr. Tabackman, was delivering his summation and recounting the abundant character witness testimony from coworkers and journalist, Dale was visibly moved, choking back tears.”
The charges were filed in 1993 and for 2 long years Mr. Dale and his family fought the charges. In 1995, along with all his character witnesses, the jury found Billy Dale not guilty in less than two hours. Ultimately the office of the independent counsel found Hillary Clinton’s sworn testimony, regarding the case, was factually inaccurate.
Mr. Dale and his family were destroyed by the Clintons. A lifelong dedicated employee of the White House sacrificed at the altar of the Clintons.
Much more to come…
To watch more details, visit:
President Obama is once again refusing to react to the line that he drew in the sand in the fight to decimate and destroy ISIL. But this time the consequences are deadly. The American people are being placed in harm’s way. A directive from the White House tells the FBI to “Back off Muslims,” even though the facts tell us that all terrorists are Muslim.
In a statement just a few days ago regarding the attack in Orlando, Obama said,
“We currently do not have any information to indicate that a foreign terrorist group directed the attack in Orlando.”
But what do we know about the attack in retrospect? The terrorist, Mateen, called 911 during the attack to pledge his allegiance to ISIS. He also called CNN News 13 in Orlando to proclaim he was carrying out the massacre on behalf of the terror group.
“I’m the shooter. It’s me. I am the shooter,” Mateen said, according to Gentili. “I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State.”
But after all these bold proclamations from the terrorist himself, our President, yet again, goes on air to deny that this man was a terrorist or affiliated with any terrorist group. When will the President of the United States actually stand up and identify the enemy within our gates and do what is necessary to protect the people he took an oath to defend?
Despite the terrorist attack in Orlando, Obama just days after the killing, opened our borders to 400 new Syrian refugees who have not and cannot be vetted, against the strong advice of the CIA director, John O. Brennan,
“The group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.”
Yet despite Brennan’s advise, Obama has admitted 441 Syrian refugees, only 5 Christians, and has settled them in Florida, Illinois and Arizona. Six were placed in Orlando, the location of the recent terrorist attack on the gay community and only days after the horrific attack. Add insult to injury, the White House refuses to share any information on these refugees with local law enforcement claiming they have a right to privacy. What about our right to safety?
Although the debate is heating up over whether the U.S. should take these refugees, the Obama administration has dramatically increased processing of refugees in order to reach its goal of 10,000 before the end of the year. In 2016 alone, Obama has admitted 4,328 Syrian refugees, 4,289 whom are Muslims, the majority were not vetted.
On a news report last night, former assistant director, James Kallstrom, says a directive has come down directly from the White House to “Back Off Muslims.” The FBI is being told by the white house that they cannot go into mosques, or proceed with normal investigative paths against Muslims. The public is told to say something if you see something, yet at the same time, Loretta Lynch, the attorney general of the U.S. says the Department of Justice has threatened to take action against any and all anti-Muslim rhetoric or violent talk. Isn’t this just a promise to go after anyone who might point the finger at questionable behavior by a Muslim, like Mateen, and an attack on free speech by the very department that is assigned to protect our rights? You also have to ask yourself why our DOJ is not taking action against the “Black Lives Matter” activists hate speech, who are screaming for law enforcement to be killed? Can you say hypocrisy?
A florida gun store owner contacted local authorities when Mateen tried to buy body armor and arsenal of ammunition 2 months before the attack in Orlando, but nothing was done. So does it matter when the public raises the red flag or are our law enforcement officers hands tied behind their backs by the current rules of engagement?
Back in December, a whistleblower, Philip Haney from Homeland Security was responsible for investigating individuals with suspected ties to radical terrorism. He had received a commendation letter for successfully tracking down 300 terrorists. However, he was visited by the State Department and the Homeland Security Civil Rights Division and told his investigations were “profiling” Muslims and was subsequently shut down. All his records were destroyed including information into the terrorist that committed the attack in San Bernadino. Even now, the White House refuses to look into the social media accounts of potential Muslim immigrants even though the San Bernadino and Orlando terrorists posted on social media.
Former FBI assistant director, James Kallstrom says we have to get this wet blanket of political correctness off the back of agents. We need to change the rules of engagement. Training manuals are being permanently altered in the name of political correctness and Congress has done nothing to make the job for the FBI easier. Although the Director of the FBI says they are critically understaffed, the administration has done nothing to alter that situation at a time when it is obvious to all Americans that it is desperately needed.
It appears all common sense and logic have been tossed out the White House window. If the majority of all terrorist are Muslim, then how do you call investigating potential Muslim refugees and immigrants “profiling?” It’s time to put the safety of the American people first and throw political correctness out the window along with the president.by
A former employee of Homeland security is blowing the whistle on Homeland Security. He claims political correctness and the Obama Administration is preventing Homeland Security from investigating terrorist organizations. Why would political correctness stop the investigation of potential terrorists? This administration calls it profiling and discrimination against Muslims.
In a speech after the San Bernadino attacks, President Obama made a speech citing,
“We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam….If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate….. it is the responsibility of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination. It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country. It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim Americans should somehow be treated differently.”
These words from our President sound reasonable. However, when the same administration defies reason by shutting down terrorist investigations by Homeland Security, because he feels it profiles Muslims, then you must ask yourself whether he is acting in the true interest of the United States and it people. Has political correctness taken over common sense and trumped our safety? At what point does the personal feelings of a group of terrorists become less important than the slaughter of innocent Americans going about their daily lives.
In a recent report on the Kelly File, the facts about political correctness and its negative effects into the investigation of radical Islamic terrorism was revealed.
[Philip Haney’s job with HSA was to investigate individuals with suspected radicalized ties to terrorism. He had received a commendation letter for successfully tracking down 300 terrorists. When he noticed a trend of people with radicalized ties coming into the United States, he began looking into a collection of global networks that were infiltrating radical Islamists into the U.S. A year into the investigation, he was visited by the State Department and the Homeland Security Civil Rights Division. They said tracking these group and individuals was problematic because they were Islamic groups and it was considered profiling. A memo was sent out denying any investigation tied to Islamic groups. As a result, his investigation was shut down. Sixty seven of his records were deleted. Among those records were investigations into the mosque in San Bernadino which was tied to Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, responsible for the terrorist attacks in the same city. Haney said if his work had continued he may have been able to thwart the attack in San Bernadino. A year ago he notified Congress and Department of Homeland Security about these issues, yet the investigation was not re-opened and the HSA retaliated by pulling him from his duties and revoking his security clearance.]
Under the Obama administration, we have seen the dismantling of intelligence in Iraq, an executive order banning CIA “enhanced interrogations” and the closing of “black Sites. Under the Bush Administration, three suspected terrorsts were waterboarded and as a result divulged information on other terrorists responsible for the 2002 bombings in Bali and on Al Qaeda leaders. While over 100 prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay have gone back to terrorism, President Obama is still determined to release the remaining prisoners and close Gitmo. Should the United States continue to “play by the rules” when our enemies refuse to do the same?
As all Americans have witnessed of late, President Obama has no problem working up a sweat over the gun rights of American citizens and has promised to pass, by executive order, strict gun laws bypassing Congress and our Constitutional rights. Still at the forefront is the administration’s view that Global warming is our biggest national security threat, and along with Bernie Sanders, and other Democrats actually believe that climate change is the main cause of terrorism today.
The real question is why President Obama has no problems calling out lawful gun owning Americans but still refuses to link self-professed Islamic terrorism to Islam. Now, he has gone so far as to shut down actual successful terrorist investigations because they happen to involve radical Islamic Muslims and calls it profiling. God help us all!
Who is Al Sharpton and why has he been given the power of the pulpit to “preach” hate and “incite” violence and racial divide by the current administration, bought and paid for by NBC, while destroying lives across the United States, the country he abhors, for profit, in the name of God?
I have no doubt Martin Luther King rolls over in his grave every time the “so-called” civil rights leader opens his mouth.
My version of Al’s dream speech?
“I have a dream that one day I will be judged by the size of my bank account, built by deceiving my own race, and NOT by my character”.
Al Sharpton was born in October of 1954 in Brooklyn New York. He has run, unsuccessfully, for Mayer and Senator of New York, and twice thrown his hat into the presidential race. Since the beginning, the name Al Sharpton has been synonymous with controversy…. criminal activity, deceit and racial division.
In 1983, Sharpton showed up at a Manhattan apartment thinking he was meeting a South American drug lord to discuss laundering money through boxing promotions, but actually met with an undercover FBI agent. As a result, he was forced to cooperate with federal agents as a snitch. He then began recording conversations with Don King, a boxing promoter and Sal Buonanno, a gangster with the Mafia. The real question is how Sharpton was able to walk into situations where mafia members freely spoke about criminal activity, without fear, that would eventually be used against them in court?
In 1987 Sharpton got involved in a case involving Tawana Brawley, a black teenager who claimed she was kidnapped, raped and sodomized by a gang of white racists. Those accused were white police officers, and assistant district attorney, Steven Pagones. Throughout the investigation Sharpton encouraged the family not to cooperate with authorities and repeatedly attacked and ridiculed the special prosecutor, Mr. Abrams. Due to Sharpton’s involvement, the case drew national attention and increased racial tensions in New York. He encouraged protests and racial division in a case that was later labeled a hoax by the grand jury. During the Brawley case, Sharpton appeared on the Morton Downey television show and during a debate about the case yelled at an audience member,
“You ain’t nothing! You a punk faggot! Now come on and do something!”
Steven Pagones, one of the accused, successfully sued Sharpton and the attorneys for Brawley. He claimed poverty, never paid his debt and refused to apologize for his actions or to the people whose lives he destroyed during the case.
In 2001, Sharpton decided to run for President, and his outstanding debt, an issue in his political career, was paid by his supporters. In 2009, Sharpton and NAN ( National Action Network) were fined $285,000 for violating election rules during his 2004 bid for the presidency. His campaign illegally accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from private sources and kept poor records of its activities and expenditures. Sharpton also lied to authorities regarding the amount of money he raised during the campaign so he could illegally qualify for federal matching federal funds.
In 1989, Sharpton, once again, saw an opportunity to exploit his own race while reaping financial benefits when he placed himself in the middle of the Central Park Jogger Case. It was alleged that a 28-year-old white women was gang raped and almost beaten to death in Central Park by a group of black teenagers. The defendants confessed to the crime, and were also found to have attacked others on the same evening including a man beaten with a pipe. Despite the defendants graphic and detailed confessions, Sharpton insisted that they were innocent victims of “a fit of racial hysteria.” Sharpton organized protests accusing the jogger’s boyfriend of the attack. Outside the courtroom, protestors chanted, “The boyfriend did it,” and called the victim, “a whore.” They called her attorney, “bitch,” “white devil,” and “slut.” In 2002, Matias Reyes, already serving a life sentence claimed responsibility for the rape alone. Although evidence and confessions pointed to a larger group, the teenagers were released and exonerated for their crime. Sharpton made no apologies for the mess he left behind.
During the administration of New York city mayor David Dinkins, an African American, 1989-1993, Sharpton said,
“David Dinkins, you wanna be the only nigger on television, only nigger in the newspaper, only nigger that can talk. Don’t cover them, don’t talk to them, cause you got the only nigger problem. Cause you know if a black man stood up next to you, they would see you for the whore that you really are.”
Later in Dinkins administration, Sharpton referred to him as,
“that nigger whore turning tricks in City Hall.”
In 1990, Sharpton was arrested and charged with 67 counts of grand larceny, falsifying business records and scheming to defraud. He was accused of stealing $250,000 from his own organization, the National Youth Movement. Sharpton’s response on paying income taxes was, “no black person owes anything.” Sharpton was acquitted of the charges and as a result claimed his acquittal would “change the political landscape.”
In 1991, Sharpton, once again, placed himself into the middle of unfortunate situation, turning it into, yet, another opportunity to stir the racial pot. On August 19, in Crown Heights, a Hasidic Jewish driver accidentally hit another car and then landed on the sidewalk hitting two black children. He immediately got out of his car to try to help the children, but was viscously attacked by a local black crowd. One of the children died. Sharpton later delivered the eulogy at the dead boys funeral which only fueled the hate. Once again, Sharpton counseled the family not to cooperate with authorities, and when he was asked to comment on the violence, said,
“We must not reprimand our children for the outrage, when it is the outrage that was put in them by an oppressive system.”
Less than 3 hours after the crash more than 250 young black men threw rocks and bottles at police, residents and homes, shouting, “Jews!, Jews!, Jews!” A large group then hunted down and murdered Yankel Rosenbaum, a rabbinical student who had nothing to do with the child’s death. Efraim Lipkind, a resident of Crown Heights, under sworn testimony claimed,
“Then we had a famous man, Al Sharpton, who came down, and he said Tuesday night, kill the Jews, two times. I heard him, and he started to lead a charge across the street to Utica.”
Later that night an Italian American, Anthony Graziosi, mistaken for a Jew, was dragged out of his car, brutally beaten and stabbed to death.
Sharpton mocked Jews during the protests he arranged, by saying,
“If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”
A year after the funeral, on the first Sabbath, Sharpton marched 400 protestors in front of the Lubavitch in Crown Heights attempting to kick up the tensions yet again, yelling “NO Justice, NO Peace!” When a grand jury failed to produce a conviction, Sharpton encouraged the Cato family to sue the driver, Yosef Lifsh. Sharpton said he would personally serve the papers to Lifsh, who had fled to Israel for his own safety. When recognized at the Airport, a local yelled to Sharpton to “go to hell,” he replied, “I am in hell already, I am in Israel.”
In 1994, Sharpton was re-baptized into the Baptist faith and became a minister, then delivered a speech at New Jersey’s Kean College where he said,
“White folks was in the cave while we black was building empires…We built pyramids before donald Trump ever knew what architecture was…we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
He also took the opportunity in this speech to say that America’s founders consisted of,
“The worst criminals, the rejects they sent from Europe..to the colonies. So some cracker come and tell you ‘Well my mother and father blood go back to the Mayflower,’ you better hold your pocket . That ain’t nothing to be proud of, that means their forefathers was crooks.”
In the summer of 1995, a rent dispute stirred violence when a African American church in Harlem raised the rent on Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a jewish owned clothing store. In turn Freddy’s raised the rent on its tenant, a black owned record store. Instead of this turning into a private dispute over rents, Al Sharpton made sure it was turned into a “for profit” opportunity using racial division as his apparatus for conflict.
Sharpton used his weekly radio show to stir the pot and his guest, Morris Powell leader of the 125th Vendor’s Association was heard using racial and anti-Semitic language to encourage Harlem residents to boycott Freddy’s. Powell was heard saying, “We are going to see that this cracker suffers.” At a rally on September 9th Sharpton told a crowd,
“I want to make it clear to the radio audience and to you here that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business on 125th street.”
On December 7th, Harar, of Freddy’s, filed court papers describing “weeks of protests outside the clothing store in which demonstrators threatened employees, hurled obscenities at “bloodsucking Jews” and talked of burning down the store.”
On December 8th, Roland James Smith, Jr, who had participated in all of Sharpton’s protests, walked into Freddy’s Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all blacks to leave the store, poured paint thiner on bins of clothes and set Freddy’s on fire. Seven people were killed including Smith himself. Sharpton immediately denied being involved in the protests and claimed there was not anti-Semitism used, but it was proven he lied.
In 2000, Sharpton held a “Redeem the Dream” Rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. One of the featured speakers was Malik Zulu Shabazz, who headed the New Black Panther Party whose hallmarks are anti-white and anti-Semitic hatred. At the rally, Shabazz called on young black people, including gang members to “unite against their common enemy…white America and its’ racist police departments.”
In March of 2006, a black stripper, Crystal Mangum, accused three Duke lacrosse players of beating, raping and sodomizing her during a party. Sharpton immediately declared that these “rich white boys” had attacked a “black girl,” and warned that” if arrests were not made immediately there would be no peace.” Later, the charges were proven to be entirely fabricated, and in 2013 Mangum was found guilty in the stabbing death of her boyfriend and is now in prison.
In 2012, we had Sharpton once agin stirring the pot in the Trayvon Martin case. This time he was joined by President Obama claiming Trayvon could have been his son, before the case even went to court. Simmerman was tried and found guilty before he ever saw the inside of a court room. As a result, the case turned into a circus and protests and violence erupted across the United States. In August of 2014, Sharpton, Obama and Holder, once again, stirred the racial pot over the shooting and ultimate death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Sharpton, once again, maneuvered his way to the pulpit to deliver the Eulogy and encouraged unrest with his old standard… “No Justice, No Peace.” Our leaders, once again, delivered the verdict before the case reached the grand jury. As a result we are still dealing with protests and unrest across the United States. Justice be damned…..Sharpton’s perception is the true reality. “No Justice, No Peace”….“burn the bitch down.”
After an estimated net worth of over $5 million, a New York Times investigation reported that Sharpton has more than $4.5 million in tax liens against him and his businesses. Sharpton has repeatedly failed to pay hotels, travel agencies, and landlords….the very people he claims to protect.
Now, the President of the United States has called Al Sharpton to the White House as an advisor on race relations?
Jesse Jackson, another so-called civil rights leader, said of Sharpton,
“I’ve know Al since he was 12 years old, and he’s arrived at the level he always wanted to arrive at, which is gratifying. He’s the man who’s the liaison to the White House, he’s the one who’s talking to the Justice Department.”
The time, place and faces change, but the situation remains the same. Take an unfortunate situation, fan the flames until it becomes unbearable and the public is so misinformed that chaos ensues. Drop the bomb and leave the public picking up the pieces of their lives. In the end, the only winners are the so-called civil rights leaders and preachers who claim God as their witness, to the riots they incite, the lives they destroy, and the divineness they have created in order to heighten their own egos and pad their own wallets.
The only consolation is knowing that one day he will face judgement by the very God he claims to represent. Imagine his surprise when he finds the Devil in disguise!